|
(Sacramento, California)
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced
Wednesday night that he will veto legislation allowing
same-sex couples to marry.
The announcement, made
through his press secretary, Margita Thompson, said that
the bill is in conflict with Proposition 22 a ballot
initiative passed in 2000 to prevent California from
recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.
"We cannot have a system
where the people vote and the Legislature derails that
vote," Thompson, said. "Out of respect for the will of
the people, the governor will veto (the bill)."
The gay marriage bill was
passed in the Assembly Tuesday night by one vote. (story)
The Senate passed the
bill on a 21 to 15 vote last Thursday. (story)
The Governor's veto
announcement came as a shock to Mark Leno (D-San
Francisco) the author of the bill.
"If this is true it would
be very disrespectful to the many millions of
Californians who support this bill to make a decision
without even allowing the proponents to make a case for
his signature, Leno said Wednesday night.
The Governor's statement
was released as the state's largest LGBT rights group,
Equality California was urging its supporters to email
or call Schwarzenegger's office to voice their support
for the legislation.
Equality California
executive director Geoffrey Korrs accused the governor
of selling out gays. "Clearly he's pandering to an
extreme right wing, Korrs said.
In a late night meeting
with Schwarzenegger's senior staff Korrs demanded that
the governor meet with gay and lesbian families before
vetoing the bill.
“One man cannot terminate
a civil rights movement," Korrs said following the
meeting. "Minority rights should never be dictated by
the majority. Hard working, Californians believe in
freedom, justice, and equality. The Governor has failed
our families and the children who will sleep tonight
wondering if, tomorrow, their parents will be legal
strangers under the law.
In San Francisco, Mayor
Gavin Newsom who allowed same-sex couples to get
marriage licenses until the state Supreme Court ordered
him to cease, blamed the veto on pressure on the
Governor from conservatives and religious groups.
"I kind of long for the
days when the governor was campaigning.. and said, I'm a
different kind of politician.. I'm not going to play
politics.. do what's right. I remember those days.. I
just haven't seen that demonstrated," Newsom told KRON
television.
"I'm pretty animated,"
the mayor said, "because I'm fed up with the hypocrisy
but boy am I proud of Mark Leno, what an incredible
success story."
Both gay Democrats and
Republicans attacked Schwarzenegger's decision.
"Instead of granting the
most basic of protections to thousands of California
families, Governor Schwarzenegger has chosen to protect
the anti-gay special interests that control the
Republican Party," said John Marble, a spokesperson for
the National Stonewall Democrats. "This legislation was
passed with the support of the California Democratic
Party, a Democratic Assembly, a Democratic Senate and a
Democratic Governor would have signed this bill into
law."
Gay Republicans were only
slightly less partisan.
“This act is in stark
contrast to the Governor’s record of support for the
LGBT community, which includes signing five pieces of
pro-gay, pro-family bills in his short time in office,”
said Patrick Guerriero, President of Log Cabin
Republicans.
“Log Cabin Republicans
take the Governor at his word, that if, and when, the
courts of California join the legislature in recognizing
the right to civil marriage equality, he will uphold and
support that decision,” Guerriero said.
Republicans who voted in
a block against the legislation were delighted with
Schwarzenegger's announcement.
"This single action goes
further to ensure his re-election in 2006 than just
about anything he can be doing right now," said
Assemblyman Chuck DeVore (R-Irvine).
In announcing he would
veto the bill the statement that Schwarzenegger
"believes gay couples are entitled to full protection
under the law and should not be discriminated against
based upon their relationship."
"He is proud that
California provides the most rigorous protections in the
nation for domestic partners," the statement from
Thompson said.
The issue of same-sex
marriage is slowly heading toward the California Supreme
Court. In March a San San Francisco judge ruled that
state laws preventing gay marriage are illegal. (story)
The case is currently under appeal.
Meanwhile, a conservative
group called the "Voters' Right to Protect Marriage
Initiative" has begun collecting signatures to have a
proposed amendment to the California Constitution
banning same-sex marriage placed on the 2006 ballot. (story)
If approved by voters it would not only bar gays and
lesbians from marrying but also void the state's
landmark domestic partner law.
“If the Governor truly
opposes discrimination, he will come out in strong
opposition to any ballot measure, court decision, or
legislation that repeals legally recognized protections
and responsibilities that are currently afforded through
domestic partnerships or permanently bans marriage
protections for same-sex couples," said Korrs. "He has
to make a decision on what he wants his legacy to be; we
hope that he will not go down in history as ‘The
Discriminator.’”
A new poll, released on
the weekend, shows that California voters are equally
divided on the issue of same-sex marriage. The Public
Policy Institute poll shows that 46 percent are in favor
of allowing same-sex couples to marry and 46 percent are
opposed.
The result is a slight
increase in the number supporting gay marriage over the
last poll on the issue, but has given Equality
California reason to believe that if the proposed
amendment makes it to voters a majority would reject it.
Earlier today the
governor vetoed a bill that would have banned the use of
any negative appeal based on prejudice against gay and
lesbian people by candidates or campaign committees. (story)
©365Gay.com 2005 |